Home
Search results “Draft articles on state responsibility of states for internationally wrongful acts”
What is STATE RESPONSIBILITY? What does STATE RESPONSIBILITY mean? STATE RESPONSIBILITY meaning
 
02:22
What is STATE RESPONSIBILITY? What does STATE RESPONSIBILITY mean? STATE RESPONSIBILITY meaning - STATE RESPONSIBILITY definition - STATE RESPONSIBILITY explanation. Source: Wikipedia.org article, adapted under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ license. SUBSCRIBE to our Google Earth flights channel - https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC6UuCPh7GrXznZi0Hz2YQnQ The laws of state responsibility are the principles governing when and how a state is held responsible for a breach of an international obligation. Rather than set forth any particular obligations, the rules of state responsibility determine, in general, when an obligation has been breached and the legal consequences of that violation. In this way they are "secondary" rules that address basic issues of responsibility and remedies available for breach of "primary" or substantive rules of international law, such as with respect to the use of armed force. Because of this generality, the rules can be studied independently of the primary rules of obligation. They establish (1) the conditions of actions to qualify as internationally wrongful, (2) the circumstances under which actions of officials, private individuals and other entities may be attributed to the state, (3) general defences to liability and (4) the consequences of liability. Until recently, the theory of the law of state responsibility was not well developed. The position has now changed, with the adoption of the Draft Articles on the Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts ("Draft Articles") by the International Law Commission (ILC) in August 2001. The Draft Articles are a combination of codification and progressive development. They have already been cited by the International Court of Justice and have generally been well received. Although the articles are general in coverage, they do not necessarily apply in all cases. Particular treaty regimes, such as the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade and the European Convention on Human Rights, have established their own special rules of responsibility.
Views: 777 The Audiopedia
What Is The Responsibility Of The State?
 
00:47
The emphasis is on the secondary rules of state responsibility that 13 may 2014 chapter 9chapter 9 responsibilitystate professor dr. Au the roles and responsibilities of federal state a. The roles and responsibilities of federal, state local parliament. Responsibilities of the state government, hsie, government what are duties government? What is Powers, responsibilities & challenges responsibility in international law oxford bibliographies. Its areas of responsibility are stated in the australian constitution and include major state responsibilities schools, hospitals, conservation. Duties of the secretary state united states. The roles and responsibilities of federal, state local responsibility wikipedia. B 2 nov 2010 the duties of a representative are clear listen to concerns constituents, reduce challenges through legislative action, and find resources chapter iv state responsibility [ ] e. Abdul ghafur hamid some of the responsibilities federal, state territory and local governments overlap, but generally each level government provides different services to responsibility human rights cases. Text of the draft articles The roles and responsibilities federal, state local responsibility wikipedia. The elements of state responsibility law teacher. Oxford public international law state responsibility. Nebraska is the lone state that has just one chamber in its legislature. International law commission, articles on state responsibility. State & local government responsibility of states for internationally wrongful acts the united draft articles on state slideshare. Iii state responsibility for violations of human rights by private actorsthe state's duty to protect. The laws of state responsibility are the principles governing when and how a is held responsible for breach an international obligation parliaments make in their areas. Responsibility of a state for its internationally wrongful acts. Areas of responsibility states shoulder the duties to administer roads, education, public safety, justice and more, as decided by voters, state lawmakers, constitution united has a federal government each 50. Text of the draft articles on responsibility states for internationally wrongful acts [ ] 2. Every internationally wrongful act of a state entails the international responsibility that law concerning states for their acts. The constitution of australia sets out the responsibilities federal government and any area not given to will become responsibility state governments. State responsibility is one of the fundamental principles international law. Aspx url? Q webcache. It arises out of the international legal system and together two chambers make state laws fulfill other governing responsibilities. It deals with the elements of state subject(s) responsibility states customary international law peremptory norms ius cogens diplomatic protection reparations circumstances 20 jan 2017 secretary state's duties relating to foreign affairs have not changed sign
Views: 229 Question Rack
HLS in the World | Constitutionalism and Courts: A Transnational Conversation Among Judges
 
01:29:00
Harvard Law School Professors Vicki Jackson and Mark Tushnet moderated a discussion among justices from high courts around the world about, among other topics, the challenges they face, the ways they interpret their constitutions and similar documents, and the roles of international and comparative law in their work. Participants were Rosalie Abella, justice, Supreme Court of Canada; Manuel Jose Cepeda LL.M. ‘87, president, International Association of Constitutional Law; Dieter Grimm LL.M. ‘65, professor of law, Humboldt University of Berlin; Koenraad Lenaerts LL.M. ‘78, president, Court of Justice of the European Union; and Sandile Ngcobo LL.M. ‘86, former chief justice, Constitutional Court of South Africa. Their talk was part of the HLS in the World bicentennial summit which took place at Harvard Law School on Friday, October 27, 2017. Read more: http://200.hls.harvard.edu/
Views: 881 Harvard Law School
CIGIE Conference, July 11, 2018:  Building on 40 Years of Excellence in Independent Oversight
 
07:57:00
Inspectors General are Building on 40 Years of Excellence in Independent Oversight. Learn more: https://www.ignet.gov/2018-commemoration. 12:00 Welcome – Carol Ochoa and Dave Berry, Conference Co-Chairs 30:00 Opening Remarks – Senator Charles Grassley 59:30 Keynote Address, “The Real Legacy of Watergate” – Bob Woodward, Associate Editor, Washington Post 1:44:14 Panel Discussion – Commemorating 40 years of Impact Gaston Gianni, Former Inspector General, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Mary Kendall, Acting Inspector General, Department of the Interior David Williams, Former Inspector General, United States Postal Service Scott MacFarlane, NBC-4 Washington (Moderator) 2:26:30 Panel Discussion – Congressional Views on Independent Oversight Senator Ron Johnson, Chairman, Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee Senator Heidi Heitkamp, Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee Paul Light, Goddard Professor of Public Service, NYU (Moderator) 4:37:38 Panel Discussion – Agency and Outside Perspectives on Independent Oversight William Barr, Former U.S. Attorney General Sylvia Burwell, Former HHS Secretary and OMB Director Martha Minow, Harvard Law School Glenn Fine, Acting Inspector General, Department of Defense (Moderator) 5:36:37 Panel Discussion –The Pillars of Independent Oversight David Apol, Acting Director, Office of Government Ethics Henry Kerner, Special Counsel, Office of Special Counsel Daniel Levinson, Inspector General, Department of Health and Human Services Max Stier, Partnership for Public Service (Moderator) 6:53:00 Panel Discussion – Preparing for the Next 40 years of Independent Oversight Margaret Weichert, Deputy Director for Management, Office of Management and Budget Michael Horowitz, Inspector General, Department of Justice/CIGIE Chair Peg Gustafson, Inspector General, Department of Commerce Susan Gibson, Inspector General, National Reconnaissance Office Carrie Johnson, National Public Radio (Moderator) 7:55:00 Closing – Michael Horowitz, Inspector General, Department of Justice/CIGIE Chair This video features footage from C-SPAN, Storyblocks, the Jimmy Carter Library, the Reagan Library, the GPO, CIGIE and various Offices of Inspectors General. The footage is used with permission or is considered to be in the public domain. Stock media from Audioblocks | www.audioblocks.com | Composer Patrick Smith and Publisher Electric Philharmonic | Composer Mikael Manvelyan | Composer C. Zatta and Publisher SkillMedia Master | Composer Jason Donnelly and Publisher Music Design by Jason Inc. | Composer Joel Thomas Hunger and Producer Zec Music Ltd.
Views: 325 IGNet Admin
Conversations with History: John Fabian Witt
 
59:31
(Visit: http://www.uctv.tv/) Conversations host Harry Kreisler welcomes Yale Law School Professor John Fabian Witt for a discussion of the craft of legal history. Topics covered include: understanding context in legal narratives; nationalism and cosmopolitanism in the evolution of civil liberties and tort law; and the importance of slavery, emancipation, and the established laws of nations in the making of Lincoln’s Code, a revolutionary change in U.S. laws of war. The conversation concludes with thoughts on how legal history could inform a discussion of the sharing economy’s impact on the law Recorded on 09/17/2015. Series: "Conversations with History" [Public Affairs] [Humanities] [Show ID: 30077]
Glenn Loury  - When Black Lives Matter: On the Persistence of Racial Inequality in America
 
01:33:26
Skip ahead to main speaker at 2:12 A talk by Glenn Loury. Brown University’s International Advanced Research Institutes (BIARI) convene participants from around the world to address pressing global issues through collaboration across academic, professional, and geographic boundaries.
Habeas corpus
 
38:10
A writ of habeas corpus (English pronunciation: /ˌheɪbiəs ˈkɔrpəs/; Latin: "you may have the body") is a writ (court order) that requires a person under arrest to be brought before a judge or into court. The principle of habeas corpus ensures that a prisoner can be released from unlawful detention—that is, detention lacking sufficient cause or evidence. The remedy can be sought by the prisoner or by another coming to the prisoner's aid. This right originated in the English legal system, and is now available in many nations. It has historically been an important legal instrument safeguarding individual freedom against arbitrary state action. It has been extended to non-police authorities, as in the 1898 Queen's Bench case of Ex Parte Dorothy Hopkins, which has successfully been utilized more recently in India to liberate a woman from a madrasa. A writ of habeas corpus, also known as the "great writ", is a summons with the force of a court order; it is addressed to the custodian (a prison official for example) and demands that a prisoner be taken before the court, and that the custodian present proof of authority, allowing the court to determine whether the custodian has lawful authority to detain the prisoner. If the custodian is acting beyond his authority, then the prisoner must be released. Any prisoner, or another person acting on his or her behalf, may petition the court, or a judge, for a writ of habeas corpus. One reason for the writ to be sought by a person other than the prisoner is that the detainee might be held incommunicado. Most civil law jurisdictions provide a similar remedy for those unlawfully detained, but this is not always called "habeas corpus". For example, in some Spanish-speaking nations, the equivalent remedy for unlawful imprisonment is the amparo de libertad ('protection of freedom'). This video is targeted to blind users. Attribution: Article text available under CC-BY-SA Creative Commons image source in video
Views: 1157 Audiopedia
Exploring Social Justice- Dead Man Walking: The Journey Continues
 
01:38:14
Sister Helen Prejean discussed her experiences working with death row inmates as well as her role in sparking national dialogue on the death penalty and helping to shape the Catholic Church's newly vigorous opposition to state executions.
Views: 55 AU Library
Academi
 
55:19
Academi is a private security services provider. The company became a division of Constellis Holdings along with Triple Canopy and other security companies that were part of the Constellis Group as the result of an acquisition in 2014. The company was founded in 1997 by Erik Prince. Formerly known as Blackwater, the company was renamed "Xe Services" in 2009, and "Academi" in 2011. The company was purchased in late 2010 by a group of private investors who changed the name to Academi and instituted a board of directors and new senior management. Prince retained the rights to the name Blackwater and has no affiliation with Academi. The company received widespread publicity in 2007, when a group of its employees shot at Iraqi civilians killing 17 and injuring 20 in Nisour Square, Baghdad. This video is targeted to blind users. Attribution: Article text available under CC-BY-SA Creative Commons image source in video
Views: 834 Audiopedia
Supreme Court: The Term in Review (2015–2016) Part 1 of 2
 
01:03:35
Four of the nation's top legal scholars discuss and analyze the decisions of the U.S. Supreme Court's 2015–2016 Term that are most likely to affect the work of federal judges in the coming years. First Amendment, Fourteenth Amendment, Sixth Amendment, Federalism and Separation of Powers, Federal Statutes, reproductive rights and RFRA, federal courts and civil procedure, criminal law, and criminal procedure, are among the topics explored and explained. (July 2016) Faculty: John S. Cooke (Federal Judicial Center), Jim Chance (Federal Judicial Center), Erwin Chemerinsky (University of California Irvine, School of Law), Michelle Harner (University of Maryland School of Law), Evan Tsen Lee (University of California, Hastings College of the Law), Laurie Levenson (Loyola Law School), Suzanna Sherry (Vanderbilt University Law School), John R. Thomas (Georgetown Law Center), and Elizabeth C. Wiggins (Federal Judicial Center). Part 1 of 2 Introduction and First Amendment A look at Heffernan v. City of Patterson - a case that asked whether a person can recover for the violation of a constitutional right even when he did not exercise it. Fourteenth Amendment The Equal Protection and Due Process clauses are the focus of four cases regarding affirmative action, legislative redistricting and whether a judge who had acted as a lawyer in a defendant's case can later sit as a judge in an appeal related to it. Federal Courts and Civil Procedure The roles and responsibilities of federal courts in a number of different circumstances. Federalism and Separation of Powers The pre-emptive effect of the Federal Arbitration Act, the nature of standing in federal courts and the role of Congress in defining judicial remedies are the topics of three decisions in this discussion. Federal Statutes Finding a prevailing party and a statute of limitations restriction under the EEOC and exceptions under the Federal Tort Claims Act are the subjects of this panel's decisions. Reproductive Rights and Religious Freedom A reproductive rights decision striking down a Texas statute and a per curiam opinion asking the parties to resolve their differences based on "new facts." Bankruptcy Bankruptcy law decisions that address what is needed to find "actual fraud" by a debtor and Puerto Rico's authority to deal with its debt crisis under the federal Bankruptcy Code are discussed.
Views: 1864 United States Courts
ISP 98
 
42:25
isp 98 4.07 1st part
Views: 606 Bankessentials ok
Snow Tha Product - “Nights" (feat. W. Darling)
 
04:27
Snow Tha Product - “Nights" (feat. W. Darling) Download: http://smarturl.it/DownloadNights Stream: http://smarturl.it/StreamNights Connect with Snow https://twitter.com/SnowThaProduct https://www.facebook.com/SnowThaProduct https://www.instagram.com/snowthaproduct https://soundcloud.com/snowthaproduct http://www.snowthaproduct.com/
Views: 6870362 SNOWTHAPRODUCT
Thứ 4 - 05/09
 
59:12
Views: 34 al01stang
Advisory Council Meeting, 10 September 2014, Rome
 
02:52:01
"The second public meeting of the Advisory Council to Google on the Right to be Forgotten, in a series of seven across Europe. More info: google.com/advisorycouncil"
Views: 2263 Google Videos
2018 Fair Housing and Lending Seminar
 
04:23:34
The seminar is a free public event that includes presentations by fair housing and lending experts. This year's event was held Thursday, April 5 and Friday, April 6, 2018 at City Hall, 701 East Broadway, Columbia, Missouri. (00:00:00) Welcome and special presentation by Columbia Mayor Brian Treece. (00:18:12) Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing in Columbia and the Community Land Trust, presented by Randy Cole, City of Columbia Housing Programs Manager. (00:48:11) Redlining, Fair Housing and Lending and Missouri, presented by Gary Kremer, Executive Director of the State Historical Society of Missouri, Adjunct Professor of History at the University of Missouri, and author. (01:52:06) Update on Fair Housing and Lending Laws and Cases, presented by University of Missouri School of Law Professor Rigel Oliveri. (02:45:15) Fair Housing and Lending Complaints under the Missouri Human Rights Act presented by Eric Krekel, Director of Investigative Operations for the Missouri Commission on Human Rights. (03:34:40) Redlining, Fair Lending and Community Reinvestment presented by Elisabeth Risch, Assistant Director of the Metropolitan St. Louis Equal Housing and Opportunity Council. (04:22:25) Closing Remarks presented by City of Columbia Human Rights Commission Chair Zach Rubin.
August 22, 2017 City Council Meeting
 
03:16:30
Niagara Falls City Council meeting for August 22, 2017. View the agenda here: https://niagarafalls.civicweb.net/document/4319?splitscreen=true
Views: 1300 Niagara Falls, Canada
Targeted Killing, Indefinite Detention, Military Commissions: What Happened to Checks and Balances?
 
59:58
"Targeted Killing, Indefinite Detention, Military Commissions: What Happened to Checks and Balances?": A Debate with Jack Goldsmith and Jameel Jaffer On April 11, 2012, at Harvard Law School, ACLU Deputy Legal Director Jameel Jaffer and Harvard Law Professor Jack Goldsmith, who in 2003 and 2004 led the Bush administration's Office of Legal Counsel, debated the legitimacy of controversial national security policies relating to targeted killing, indefinite detention, and military commissions. The debate, which was sponsored by the South Asian Law Students Association, was introduced by HLS law student Al-Amyn Sumar and moderated by Professor Dan Meltzer, who served as Principal Deputy Counsel to President Obama in 2009 and 2010. Fore more information, please visit: https://www.aclu.org/
Views: 1520 ACLU
HIGH COURT of AUSTRALIA - WikiVidi Documentary
 
01:07:21
The High Court of Australia is the supreme court in the Australian court hierarchy and the final court of appeal in Australia. It has both original and appellate jurisdiction, the power of judicial review over laws passed by the Parliament of Australia and the parliaments of the States, and the ability to interpret the Constitution of Australia thereby powerfully shaping the development of federalism in Australia. The High Court is mandated by section 71 of the Constitution, which vests in it the judicial power of the Commonwealth of Australia. The Court was constituted by, and its first members were appointed under, the Judiciary Act 1903. It now operates under sections 71 to 75 of the Constitution, the Judiciary Act, and the High Court of Australia Act 1979. It is composed of seven Justices: the Chief Justice of Australia, currently Susan Kiefel, and six other Justices. They are appointed by the Governor-General of Australia, on the advice of the federal government, and under the ... ____________________________________ Shortcuts to chapters: 00:01:51: Role of the court 00:03:19: Original jurisdiction 00:05:37: Appellate jurisdiction 00:07:04: Appeals to the Privy Council 00:11:48: Appellate jurisdiction for Nauru 00:12:30: History 00:15:18: Constitutional conventions 00:20:24: Formation of the court 00:24:33: First years of the court 00:27:22: Post-war period 00:29:41: Jurisprudence 00:30:20: Griffith court 00:33:27: Knox, Isaacs and Gavan Duffy courts 00:36:31: Latham court 00:38:48: Dixon court 00:40:37: Barwick court 00:42:35: Gibbs court 00:44:59: Mason court 00:48:04: Brennan court 00:49:50: Gleeson court 00:52:18: French court 00:52:57: Kiefel court 00:53:53: Composition of the court 00:54:05: Appointment process 00:56:58: Initial composition 00:58:05: Expansion of composition 00:59:19: Recent developments in composition 01:01:38: Judge's Associates 01:03:10: Building ____________________________________ Copyright WikiVidi. Licensed under Creative Commons. Wikipedia link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Court_of_Australia
Nathanson Centre Conference on Public and Private Corruption - Keynote (Nov 7, 2014)
 
01:30:38
KEYNOTE ADDRESS: Global Corruption And The Universal Approach Of The UN Convention Against Corruption John Sandage, Director, Division For Treaty Affairs, United Nations Office On Drugs And Crime (UNODC), Vienna Introduction by Alex Himelfarb, Director (emeritus) of the Glendon School of Public and International Affairs, York University, and Head of the Centre for Global Challenges. (Introduced by Margaret Beare, Osgoode Hall Law School)
2017 Gross Lecture: Ontario Chief Justice Strathy (LLB '74)
 
01:17:25
The 2017 Morris A. Gross Memorial Lecture was delivered by the Honourable George Strathy (LLB '74), Chief Justice of Ontario. Justice Strathy spoke about "Judicial Courage and Restraint in Canadian Constitutional History." The lecture was an introduction to the David Asper Centre for Constitutional Rights’ 2017 Constitutional Roundtable series, which will be in celebration of Canada’s Sesquicentennial.
Views: 289 UTorontoLaw
Bailouts And The Foreclosure Crisis: Report Of The Special Inspector General For The Troubled Asset
 
02:42:26
Bailouts And The Foreclosure Crisis: Report Of The Special Inspector General For The Troubled Asset - House Oversight Committee - 2011-01-26 - Witnesses: The Honorable Neil Barofsky, Special Inspector General, Troubled Asset Relief Program and Tim Massad, Acting Assistant Secretary for Financial Stability, Department of Treasury. Video provided by the U.S. House of Representatives.
Views: 4031 HouseResourceOrg
Obstruction Of Justice: Does The Justice Dept Have To Respond To A Congressional Subpoena?
 
01:43:21
Obstruction Of Justice: Does The Justice Dept Have To Respond To A Congressional Subpoena? - House Oversight Committee - 2011-06-13 - House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. Witnesses: Professor Charles Tiefer, Commissioner, Commission on Wartime Contracting; Mr. Morton Rosenberg, Former Specialist in American Public Law, American Law Division, Congressional Research Service; Mr. Todd Tatelman, Legislative Attorney, American Law Division, Congressional Research Service; Mr. Louis Fisher, Scholar in Residence, The Constitution Project. Video provided by U.S. House of Representatives.
Views: 4798 HouseResourceOrg
Biobanking: When Issues with Tissues Come a Knockin'
 
01:03:03
Presenters: Carol J. Weil, Program Director for Ethical and Regulatory Affairs, National Cancer Institute and Samantha Smith, OHRP Carol's talk focuses broadly on current ethical and regulatory controversies involved with the collection, storage and research use of biospecimens. Issues covered include informed consent frameworks, privacy concerns, the identifiability of genomic data, different models of data sharing, and the return of research results. Learn more about the Office for Human Rights Protections (OHRP) at http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp. -- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) http://www.hhs.gov We accept comments in the spirit of our comment policy: http://www.hhs.gov/web/socialmedia/po... HHS Privacy Policy http://www.hhs.gov/Privacy.html
Bank Markazi v. Peterson: Oral Argument - January 13, 2016
 
01:01:42
Facts: Deborah Peterson and a group of other plaintiffs were seeking to obtain judgments for injury or wrongful death during acts of terrorism by Iran. The Iran Central Bank (Bank Markazi) owned nearly $2 billion worth of bonds that were held in an account in New York City. Based on the Uniform Commercial Code, these assets were not considered assets of Bank Markazi, and therefore could not be attached by the plaintiffs and were immune from attachment under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act. While this case was pending, Congress passed the Iran Threat Reduction and Syria Human Rights Act of 2012, Section 8772 of which stated, “[T]he financial assets that are identified in and the subject of proceedings in the United States District for the Southern District of New York in Peterson et al. v. Islamic Republic of Iran et al., shall be subject to execution…in order to satisfy any judgment to the extent of any compensatory damages awarded against Iran for damages for personal injury or death caused by an act of [terrorism].” The plaintiffs moved for summary judgment based on Section 8772. Bank Markazi argued that Section 8772 violated the United States’ separation of powers because the law was solely directed at this specific case. The district court granted summary judgment for plaintiffs and ordered the turnover of the assets. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed. Question: Does a statute that effectively directs a particular result in a single pending case violate the separation of powers? For more information about this case see: https://www.oyez.org/cases/2015/14-770 Section 1: 00:00:05 Section 2: 00:24:32 Section 3: 00:45:32 Section 4: 00:56:00 PuppyJusticeAutomated videos are created by a program written by Adam Schwalm. This program is available on github here: https://github.com/ALSchwalm/PuppyJusticeAutomated The audio and transcript used in this video is provided by the Chicago-Kent College of Law under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. See this link for details: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Advisory Council Meeting, 16 October, London
 
04:11:55
"The sixth public meeting of the Advisory Council to Google on the Right to be Forgotten, in a series of seven across Europe. More info: google.com/advisorycouncil"
Views: Google Videos
Samuel Moyn on "From Aggression to Atrocity" Feb 16, 2018
 
01:38:11
Title: "From Aggression to Atrocity: Rethinking the History of International Criminal Law" Speaker: Samuel Moyn, Yale Date: Feb 16, 2018 url: https://nathanson.osgoode.yorku.ca/events/emerging-trends-criminal-justice-seminar-series/
The Beach Boys
 
01:06:36
The Beach Boys are an American rock band, formed in Hawthorne, California in 1961. The group's original lineup consisted of brothers Brian, Dennis and Carl Wilson, their cousin Mike Love and friend Al Jardine. Initially managed by the Wilsons' father Murry, the Beach Boys signed with Capitol Records in 1962. The band's early music gained popularity across the United States for its close vocal harmonies and lyrics reflecting a Southern California youth culture of surfing, cars and romance. During the early to mid-1960s, Brian Wilson's growing creative ambition and songwriting ability would dominate the group's musical direction. The primarily Wilson-composed Pet Sounds album and "Good Vibrations" single featured a complex, intricate and multi-layered sound that represented a departure from the simple surf rock of the Beach Boys' early years. This video targeted to blind users. Attribution: Article text available under CC-BY-SA Creative Commons image source in video
Views: 334 encyclopediacc
City of Santa Rosa Council Meeting September 4, 2018
 
04:07:24
City meeting agendas, packets, archives, and live stream are always available at https://santa-rosa.legistar.com
Seth Lazar on "Proxy Battles in the Ethics of War" (Nathanson Centre, October 10, 2014)
 
01:21:20
Friday, October 10, 2014 Seminar Title: "Proxy Battles in the Ethics of War" Speaker: Seth Lazar (Australian National University) Venue: "Legal Philosophy between Law and Transnationalism" seminar series, Nathanson Centre, Osgoode Hall Law School, Toronto URL: http://nathanson.osgoode.yorku.ca/programs/seminar-series/legal-philosophy-between-state-transnationalism/2014-2015/
YOU SAY, I SLAY! - (Type "!class" in the chat)
 
03:20:11
▶ DONATE HERE: https://twitch.streamlabs.com/prohenis (Donations Appear on Stream!) ========================================­============== ▶ STREAM COMMANDS: • "!challenge" - Gives link to send me challenges • "!class" - Gives link to suggest class setup • "!donate" - Gives link to donate • "!fb" - Gives link to my Facebook page • "!g2a" - Gives my referral link for G2A • "!gone" - *SECRET COMMAND* (**ONE RULE:** Only to be used when I am AFK ;) • "!insta" - Gives link to my Instagram • "!krng" - Gives links to KARNAGEclan YouTube, Twitter, and Twitch • "!name" - Gives user the CORRECT way to spell/pronounce my name • "!psn" - Gives PSN username • "!sc" - Gives Snapchat username • "!steamfp" - Gives link to my Steam Fanpage • "!steamid" - Gives link to my Steam Profile • "!twch" - Gives link to my Twitch • "!twt" - Gives link to my Twitter ========================================­============== Connect With Me: ▶ Twitter - http://bit.ly/HenisTwitter ▶ Facebook - http://bit.ly/HenisFacebook ▶ Instagram - http://bit.ly/HenisInstagram ▶ Snapchat - RealProHenis ▶ Twitch - http://bit.ly/HenisTwitch ▶ Steam Group - http://bit.ly/HenisSteamFanPage Play With Me: ▶ Steam - http://bit.ly/HenisSteamID ▶ PSN - KRNGHenis Business Email: [email protected] ========================================­============== My Sponsors: ▶ FreeMyApps: (USE referral "HENISAPPS") http://bit.ly/HenisApps ▶ Auto-Duck: (USE code "HENIS" for 10% OFF!) http://auto-duck.com/buy/PROHENIS ▶ Ironside Computers: (USE code "HENIS") ▶ G2A: (USE my REFERAL LINK!) https://www.g2a.com/r/prohenis ========================================­============== My Network: ★Want to PARTNER YOUR CHANNEL with a really good MCN and MAKE MONEY off of YOUR VIDEOS? JOIN the Fullscreen Family! Click Here ▶ http://bit.ly/HenisFullscreen ========================================­============== ♫Music:♫ NCS: https://www.youtube.com/user/NoCopyrightSounds BluntedBeatz: https://www.youtube.com/user/CaughtUpBeats ========================================­============== KARNAGEclan: YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/KARNAGEclan Twitter - https://twitter.com/K4RN4GE_Clan Twitch - http://www.twitch.tv/karnageclan Video Uploaded by KRNG Henis / ProHenis / KARNAGE Henis Multistreaming with https://restream.io/?ref=pMX&s=6 About ProHenis: Hey, my name is Henry and everyday I strive to bring you guys entertaining Call of Duty and Fornite videos and streams. If you have any questions about my videos or suggestions on how I can improve my content, don't hesitate to leave a comment on one of my videos or tweet me @ProHenis - thanks for checking out my channel and I hope to see you back on a regular basis! YOU SAY, I SLAY! - (Type "!class" in the chat) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C95vSvMjuDY ProHenis https://www.youtube.com/prohenis
Views: 3678 ProHenis
Lozano v. Montoya Alvarez: Oral Argument - December 11, 2013
 
01:02:54
Facts: Diana Alvarez and Manuel Lozano, two native Columbians, met while living in London and had a daughter together. At trial Alvarez testified that, from 2005 until 2008, Lozano was abusing and threatening to rape her. Lozano denied these allegations and claimed that, although they had normal couple problems, they were generally "very happy together." In November 2008, Alvarez took the child and, after a stay at a women's shelter, moved to her sister's home in New York. A psychiatrist diagnosed the child with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) caused by her experience living in the United Kingdom, moving to America, staying at a women's shelter, and knowing that her mother had been threatened. However, six months later, the child's condition drastically improved. After Lozano exhausted all remedies within the UK to attempt to locate the child, on November 10, 2010, he filed a Petition for Return of Child under Article 2 of the Hague Convention and the International Child Abduction Remedies Act in U.S. district court. The district court held that the child was now settled in New York and that removing the child would cause undue harm. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed. Question: Does the one-year statute of limitations on a petition to return an abducted child under the Hague Convention remain in effect when one parent has deliberately concealed the child's whereabouts from the other parent? Conclusion: Yes. Justice Clarence Thomas delivered the opinion for the unanimous Court. The Supreme Court held that the policy of equitable tolling, which pauses the running of a statute of limitations when a litigant has diligently pursued his rights, does not apply to the Hague Convention's provision on international child abduction. Because equitable tolling extends an otherwise discrete time period, it must be proven to align with statutory intent. However, the Hague Convention is a treaty, not a statute, and a treaty by its nature must be interpreted based on principles shared by the nations involved. Equitable tolling is not an established part of the background law of all signatories of the Hague Convention and therefore has no role in the interpretation of the treaty. The Court also held that the one-year period is not actually a statute of limitations because its expiration opens the door for other considerations that could result in the return of the child to the home country. In his concurring opinion, Justice Samuel A. Alito, Jr. wrote that the Hague Convention allowed courts to consider all factors relevant to the child's wellbeing and order the child's return to the home country even after the one year has elapsed. Nothing in the Hague Convention specifies that the one-year period places limits on a court's discretionary power to order the child's return. The one-year period is the time when the court must order the return, but not the only time the court may do so. Justice Stephen Breyer and Justice Sonia Sotomayor joined in the concurrence. For more information about this case see: https://www.oyez.org/cases/2013/12-820 Section 1: 00:00:05 Section 2: 00:25:30 Section 3: 00:46:32 Section 4: 00:57:32 PuppyJusticeAutomated videos are created by a program written by Adam Schwalm. This program is available on github here: https://github.com/ALSchwalm/PuppyJusticeAutomated The audio and transcript used in this video is provided by the Chicago-Kent College of Law under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. See this link for details: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
COLUMBINE HIGH SCHOOL massacre - WikiVidi Documentary
 
01:17:57
The Columbine High School massacre was a school shooting that occurred on April 20, 1999, at Columbine High School in Columbine, an unincorporated area of Jefferson County in the American state of Colorado. In addition to the shootings, the complex and highly planned attack involved a fire bomb to divert firefighters, propane tanks converted to bombs placed in the cafeteria, 99 explosive devices, and car bombs. The perpetrators, senior students Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold, murdered 12 students and one teacher. They injured 21 additional people, and three more were injured while attempting to escape the school. The pair subsequently committed suicide. Although their precise motives remain unclear, the personal journals of the perpetrators document that they wished their actions to rival the Oklahoma City bombing and other deadly incidents in the United States in the 1990s. The attack has been referred to by USA Today as a "suicidal attack [that was] planned as a grand—if badly implem... ____________________________________ Shortcuts to chapters: 00:02:00: Preliminary activities and intent 00:08:16: Medication 00:08:43: Journals and videos 00:10:25: Firearms 00:12:03: Prior to the massacre 00:15:45: 11:19 a.m.: Shooting begins 00:21:17: 11:22 a.m.: Police response 00:26:54: 11:29 a.m. – 11:36 a.m.: Library massacre 00:40:28: 12:08 p.m.: Suicide of the perpetrators 00:45:29: Crisis ends 00:48:35: Immediate aftermath 00:51:55: Rationale 00:52:50: Bullying 00:55:39: Psychopathy and depression 00:58:26: Video games 00:59:37: Social climate 01:00:11: Goth subculture 01:00:41: Music 01:02:55: Harris and Klebold as modern revolutionaries 01:03:57: Secret Service report on school shootings 01:05:15: School security 01:06:00: Anti-bullying policies 01:06:39: Police tactics 01:08:01: Gun control 01:08:59: Memorials 01:09:42: Becoming part of the vernacular 01:10:53: Fandom 01:11:47: Influence on subsequent school shootings ____________________________________ Copyright WikiVidi. Licensed under Creative Commons. Wikipedia link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Columbine_High_School_massacre
SECSRT 055 Dead Guys, That's What This Podcast's About
 
01:32:00
This weeks roundtable includes a hangout with a little collegitate loyalty. Shane Bailey is Joined by Blair Smyly and Drew Young to discuss last weeks games in the SEC and a look ahead to see what's in store for the teams this week. Highlights include Shane actually saying something nice about UT's D, Drew talks about dead guys, and Blair discusses Miss. States newest marketing ideas. All this and more on this weeks SECSRT.
Views: Shane Bailey